Understanding the Economic Impacts of Flooding and Risk Modelling

March 2022

Flooding is a problem the world over – from the recent floods in Brisbane, Australia, to the string of named storms in the UK in 2022, it is clear that flooding causes disruption to lives and livelihoods.

A paper published in 2021 estimated that since 2000, 290 million people have been affected by flooding, with 2.3 million square kilometres of land inundated (1).

2022 has seen the UK experience a record three named storms back-to-back in the same week (Dudley, Eunice, and Franklin), causing widespread flooding from the River Severn, River Derwent, and River Ouse to Wales and the River Mersey.

Total properties flooded/protected Total properties protected

The EA has estimated that some 400 properties were affected by flooding in those three storms, with some 35,000 properties protected from flooding through flood defence schemes.

Whether this is the result of climate change and increased frequency/intensity of storms, or just through variance, the implication is that flooding is becoming a more common issue and that our flood defence infrastructure has to be “fit for purpose” and fit for the future.
But how is that flood defence spending reviewed and implemented?
Typically, a scheme will have to go through an economic assessment to show that it will deliver a return on investment.
Crudely, that building the flood defence will save money over the lifetime of its implementation, including maintenance.
To do this, we have to understand flood damages.

How Flooding Causes Economic Damages

Flood damages are generally a function of the depth of water against the underlying asset—in this example, a property, be it residential, commercial, or industrial.

A property is assigned a number of costs at different depths to help obtain a relationship between the depth of flood water and damage to the building.

For example, a 15cm inundation of a building may damage floors and furniture, which has economic value.

A flood of 1m, will likely affect all the same items, plus electrical supplies and additional assets.

This means that as depth increases, flood cost increases as well, up to the point where a building is, in effect, a total loss and needs to be rebuilt. This ties to insurance claims, loss of earnings, and structural loss.

 

Flood Risk Modelling for Economic Impact Assessment

We can forecast risk to properties by using a property database and contrasting it with flood model data to get the maximum predicted flood level at each asset location. Colour coded by risk and depth, this is the first step in creating an economic assessment.

Flood Risk Map

We can repeat this process with both the defended and undefended scenarios to derive an estimate of the effect of the flood defence – what damage reduction do we get by putting in a flood defence?

Accounting for Climate Change in Economic Assessments

To get an accurate picture of the benefits over the lifetime of the asset, we need to take into account climate change.

The likelihood is that river flows will increase over the coming years as a result of changing climate, therefore an asset has to be built to take this into account(2).

Calculating Economic Viability of Flood Defence Schemes

To get the final investment picture, we take the sum of damage across a range of return periods to create something called Annual Average Damage (AAD) – the likely damage that might occur in any given year – compared with the lifetime of the asset, say 25 years, if the cost of the asset is less than the sum of the damages, then the flood defence is likely economically effective.

This is evaluated against the scenario called ‘do nothing’, which is what would happen if no intervention is applied.

Additional economic analysis (accounting for inflation, uncertainty, risk, and optimism bias) is built into the process, but that is the long and short of it.

However, the five-case model(3) used by the EA takes this one step further and incorporates strategic options, long lists, short lists, and monitoring and evaluation to identify a preferred option. This ensures that defences are rigorously tested and evaluated to ensure that they are fit for purpose and well considered.

Summary Outline of Key Appraisal Steps

Long-Term Economic Impacts of Flooding on Public Health

In August 2020 Public Health England published a study(4) looking at the impact of flooding on public health and wellbeing.

The study concluded that flooding has an adverse impact on people’s well-being for up to three years after the event, indicating that the above model of economic damage may be missing a crucial aspect of economics—long-term financial impact and public health demand after a flood event.

If this is the case, it has an impact on the economic business case for flood risk defences – increasing the likelihood that flood defences would meet the economic betterment criteria for approval.

As yet, the economic business case model and the five-case model have not been updated to include this potential impact, but they are being considered to be amended as a result of the study.

References

(1) Tellman, B., Sullivan, J.A., Kuhn, C. et al. Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods. Nature 596, 80–86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03695-w

(2) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/934339/Accounting_for_the_Effects_Of_Climate_Change_-_Supplementary_Green_Book_.._.pdf

(3) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938046/The_Green_Book_2020.pdf

(4) https://www.gov.uk/guidance/flooding-and-health-national-study

Request your free, expert quote now

Aegaea work alongside home owners, private developers, planning consultants, architects, local authorities, international development agencies and contractors. Aegaea know exactly how to help you.

Upload File(s)